Introduction
Whenever the term 4D-BIM is invoked, it usually comes with a promise of efficiency. Time, we are told, is simply the “fourth dimension” attached to the model: a neat schedule linked to geometry, a Gantt chart embedded in 3D space. In this view, 4D-BIM is little more than project management software dressed up in parametric clothing. Then everything falls off schedule, and we blame other stuff: the construction site being what it is, unexpected events, scheduling mistakes.
What gets lost in this managerial conception is the fact that time is never neutral. Anyone who has worked on a real project knows this: time drags in endless permit reviews, accelerates under political pressure, collapses when a supply chain fails, stretches when funding pauses. Construction unfolds not as a smooth, linear schedule but as a series of compressions, expansions, digressions, and turning points. To reduce time to a numeric layer in a database is to miss the narrative dimension of building.
Reasoning around a complicated schedule last week, I tried to map these fluctuations in probability and all of a sudden the Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin came to my aid. In his study of the novel, Bakhtin adopted the term chronotope — originally invented by the mathematician Hermann Minkowski to describe the four-dimensional space — and used it to describe the inseparability of time and space in narrative. For him, the chronotope was the matrix of narrative meaning itself: the road that shapes encounters, the threshold that marks turning points, the castle that condenses centuries. Each chronotope carries a logic of events: what can happen, how long it takes, how it feels.
So, here’s the thought experiment: instead of stopping at the so-called 4D-BIM, with the mechanistic “adding of time” to a model, time on a construction project can also be mapped as the digital staging of chronotopes: narrative units where time and space meet, bend, and shape experience. Project management is the art of organising work while foreseeing the unexpected. What if Bakhtin can give us unexpected tools to achieve that? The planning office becomes a threshold chronotope, the review cycle a corridor of suspension, the construction site a polyphonic road. Delays stop being data errors to be eliminated; they become plot twists that reframe the story.
Re-reading construction through Bakhtin. Our aim here is not to dismiss digital workflows but to enrich them, to suggest a framework for narrating the unpredictable temporality of projects and, unless you are able to map them, unforeseen circumstances will continue to be… unforseen. To build is to tell a story across time-spaces. And like all good stories, the most interesting parts often happen in the digressions.
1. Chronotope 101
The Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin coined the term chronotope to describe the inseparability of time and space in narrative. For Bakhtin, every storyworld is structured through specific configurations of temporal rhythms and spatial settings: the road novel, with its unfolding of time along a linear journey; the castle, where events seem suspended in timelessness; the threshold, where decisive moments occur at the edge of spaces. In short, the chronotope is not just a background but the very matrix that shapes what kind of events are possible and how they are experienced.
In our everyday practice, every building project creates its own chronotopes: the construction site as a liminal threshold, the bureaucratic office as the timeless corridor where papers circulate endlessly, the planning schedule as a narrative arc in Gantt-chart form. The design process is not merely a technical sequence but a story told through time-spaces, unfolding across drafting tables, meeting rooms, and excavated soil.
Construction processes are inherently narrative because they involve characters (stakeholders, contractors, regulators), plots (the unfolding of design intentions, clashes, delays, resolutions), and settings (sites, offices, digital models) that are temporally charged. The excavation of a foundation is not just a technical act but a temporal marker, a “chapter opening” that anchors all subsequent phases. A delay in a permit functions as a narrative digression, altering the pace and rhythm of the project. Even in the digital sphere, when a BIM model is linked to a schedule, we witness the translation of narrative time-space into a visual and computational chronotope.
Thus, Bakhtin’s idea allows us to rethink architecture not only as spatial practice but as temporal storytelling. The chronotope, transplanted into construction, illuminates how every project is a novel in progress: a structure of anticipation, interruption, and resolution written in both bricks and bytes.
Let’s see how.
2. Building as Story: the Narratives of Construction
If Bakhtin taught us that narratives are structured around time-space configurations, then construction projects can be read as stories in their own right. The project unfolds not only as a technical procedure but as a text: chapters, subplots, digressions, and climaxes. Thinking in narrative terms helps us to understand why projects rarely follow a neat linear path, and why disruptions are not exceptions but constitutive features of the tale.
Planning as Preface: the Script Before the Play
Every novel has a beginning that sets the tone. In construction, this role belongs to the planning stage: feasibility studies, design briefs, and conceptual drawings. To some people, these are the chapters of the building itself. Darling, they are not. At best, they are the preface to the project’s story, not yet action but hopefully foreshadowing the kind of narrative that will unfold. A masterplan is a script that declares, “Here is where the characters will move, here is how the drama will evolve.” But it’s just a script. Nothing is happening yet.
Think of a 4D-BIM environment where a project timeline is overlaid onto the spatial model. At this stage, the story needs to be treated as hypothetical: scenes are staged in advance, actors are assigned their entrances and exits. Like a playwright, the planner dictates a temporal architecture: the curtain will rise when the excavation begins; Act II starts with the erection of the structural frame. The fact that most projects deviate from these scripts does not diminish their importance; rather, it highlights the performative tension between plan and performance, intention and realisation.
Bureaucracy as Digression: Approvals, Pauses, Delays
In the classical novel, digressions interrupt the flow of the plot, sometimes frustrating the reader, sometimes enriching the narrative texture. Bureaucracy in construction functions in a similar way. Permits, approvals, regulatory reviews, and stakeholder negotiations create loops of suspended time that alter the project’s pace. The chronotope of the “office corridor” is emblematic here: documents circulating, signatures awaited, decisions deferred.
Consider a planning permission process in a dense urban context. A design may remain frozen for months while awaiting municipal clearance. The building exists in a limbo state: drawn but unbuilt, imagined but unrealised. In narrative terms, this is a chapter where the protagonist is held captive, the story advancing in microscopic increments. On digital platforms, these bureaucratic pauses manifest as stagnant versions in a document management system, models archived in waiting folders, emails chasing signatures.
Rather than treating these as external obstacles, the chronotopic lens suggests they are intrinsic to the story of building. They are narrative devices that produce suspense, reshape expectations, and often lead to unexpected turns — redesigns, cost recalibrations, or even the cancellation of projects.
Construction as Plot: Thickening Time and Accumulating Events
When the excavators arrive on site, the plot thickens. Bakhtin described plot not merely as a sequence of events but as the density of lived time. Construction embodies this perfectly: once building begins, time and space acquire weight, rhythm, and irreversibility. The project enters its central chapters, where decisions manifest in physical form and errors become visible, sometimes indelibly so.
A BIM-linked schedule offers a revealing metaphor. As the model advances in sync with time, walls rise, systems are installed, interiors are finished. Each phase is not just a task but a narrative episode with its own climax: the topping-out ceremony, the handover of keys, the unveiling of a façade. Yet the richness lies in the unforeseen twists — a supply-chain disruption, a sudden regulation change, a pandemic halting works — that alter the tempo of the narrative. These disruptions are not side notes; they become plot twists, bending the trajectory of the story.
Moreover, the construction site itself is a chronotope of extraordinary density. Workers, machines, and materials converge in a space-time of simultaneity: multiple trades working in parallel, deadlines colliding, tasks overlapping. It is a polyphonic stage where different temporalities coexist — the slow curing of concrete alongside the urgent installation of scaffolding, the long lead times of façade elements contrasted with the daily cycle of safety checks.
To read construction as a story is to acknowledge that it has characters (architects, engineers, contractors, clients), settings (sites, offices, digital platforms), and above all, a temporal logic that gives shape to its unfolding. Like all stories, it carries anticipation, suspense, and resolution, though rarely in neat arcs. The narrative form of building is one of interruptions, digressions, and polyphonic voices, closer to the sprawling novel than the tight three-act play.
3. Chronotopes of the Project
Bakhtin described the chronotope as the “intrinsic connectedness of temporal and spatial relationships that are artistically expressed in literature.” Following his works, we can catalogue recurrent patterns: the road, the threshold, the castle, the salon. Each embodies a way in which space is charged with time, structuring narrative possibility. Transposed into construction, these archetypes illuminate how projects unfold as lived and narrated experiences.
The Threshold: Decision Points and Permissions
For Bakhtin, “the chronotope of the threshold… can be combined with the motif of encounter … of crisis and break in a life.” In building projects, thresholds emerge at moments of irreversible decision: the granting of a building permit, the signing of a contract, the beginning of excavation. Each is a passage into a new phase of the project, moments charged with anticipation and risk. The planning office, with its stamped documents and approval rituals, is itself a chronotopic threshold: a liminal zone between imagination and realisation.
The Road: Construction in Motion
In Bakhtin’s analysis, the road is “a place of encounters, collisions, dialogic exchanges,” where stories unfold in movement. The construction site can be read as such a road, not linear but densely intersecting. Deliveries arrive, trades overlap, inspections occur; each day brings new encounters between materials, machines, and humans. The road chronotope captures the simultaneity of construction: a polyphony of timelines moving together, sometimes in harmony, sometimes in conflict.
4. Digital Chronotopes
Suppose the construction site is a stage where multiple chronotopes collide. In that case, digital platforms — particularly BIM and its 4D extensions — can be read as spaces where these temporal-spatial logics are explicitly formalised. Digital tools do not eliminate the narrative quality of construction; rather, they render it visible, calculable, and sometimes paradoxically, even more contingent.
Information Models and Version Control as Narrative Frames
In Bakhtin’s terms, a narrative frame is the boundary that sets a story apart, defining where it begins and ends. BIM models function in precisely this way: each saved version is a narrative frame that freezes a particular stage of the story. A clash-detection run in Navisworks or a snapshot in Revit is not just a technical artefact but a chapter in the unfolding novel of the project.
Version control platforms — whether in BIM 360, Autodesk Construction Cloud, or Git-like systems adapted to design workflows — create a branching chronotope. Each branch represents a possible storyline: one where the façade design changes direction, another where a structural system is revised. Just as Bakhtin emphasised the polyphony of voices in the novel, here we find the polyphony of design intentions coexisting in digital space, awaiting negotiation.
Workflow Chronotopes: Collaboration Across Disciplines
Bakhtin described the novel as a dialogic form, where different voices and perspectives collide. Digital workflows embody this dialogism. A federated BIM model is not a singular narrative but a composite chronotope where structural engineers, MEP consultants, architects, and contractors inscribe their own temporalities into the same shared space.
For example, the architect’s timeline may privilege early massing and façade articulation, while the mechanical engineer’s timeline foregrounds ductwork installation that occurs much later in the physical sequence but must be resolved early in design. The BIM environment brings these divergent chronotopes into dialogue, making visible the temporal disjunctions of the disciplines and forcing coordination.
Coordination meetings, whether in-person or virtual, act as salons in the Bakhtinian sense: spaces where time is filled with conversation and negotiation. But unlike the salons of the nineteenth century, these digital salons are embedded in models that embody both time and space, collapsing speculative dialogue into actionable sequences.
Embracing Contingency: Delays as Narrative Possibilities
I know, I know. Nobody likes delays, reworks and other contingencies. In construction, delays are often treated as data to be minimised: risk factors, cost overruns, inefficiencies. Yet from a chronotopic perspective, delays are narrative events that reshape the story of the project. They are the digressions and detours that Bakhtin saw as essential to the unfolding of a plot.
Consider the pandemic-induced construction halt we’ve all suffered between 2020 and 2021. In scheduling software, it registers as a red bar, a disruption to the baseline. In narrative terms, it becomes a pivotal chapter: a crisis that forces redesign for health measures, rethinking of supply chains, or even innovation in remote coordination. Digital chronotopes thus help us not only measure but reinterpret delays as moments of narrative richness, where the story branches into unplanned but potentially fertile directions.
In this light, the chronotope becomes a lens to revalue contingency. Instead of erasing or hiding it, digital workflows can narrativise delays: documenting their causes, visualising their impact, and integrating their lessons into future projects. Like a novel enriched by its digressions, a construction project gains depth through its interruptions.
Conclusion
Bakhtin’s chronotope reminds us that every project is more than the sum of its drawings, contracts, and schedules. It is a lived narrative, structured by the interweaving of time and space, punctuated by thresholds and delays, and enriched by encounters both planned and unforeseen. To bring this lens into construction is to recognise that architecture is not only about designing spaces, but about narrating how those spaces come into being across time.
What emerges is the need for a temporal-spatial literacy in architecture: the ability to read and write projects not only in spatial terms but also in temporal ones. Just as a literate reader can discern the rhythm of a sentence or the pacing of a plot, a temporally literate architect can perceive how schedules, workflows, and delays shape the very fabric of a project. This literacy does not oppose efficiency but complements it, offering a deeper awareness of how narratives unfold in design and construction. In the age of 4D-BIM, where time is explicitly modelled alongside space, such literacy becomes a professional necessity as well as a theoretical horizon.
Open Questions and Future Thought Experiments
If we accept that projects are novels in progress, what does this imply for practice? Should architects embrace the role of narrators, consciously structuring stories that clients, contractors, and communities inhabit? Or should they see themselves as editors, orchestrating a polyphony of voices into coherence without imposing a single plot?
Future thought experiments might extend the chronotope beyond construction into building life cycles: the occupation, maintenance, and eventual decay of a structure. What chronotopes emerge when a building is abandoned, repurposed, or demolished? How might digital twins, with their promise of continuous temporal updating, reframe the narrative arc from discrete project to open-ended story?
Bakhtin taught us to read literature through its chronotopes. Reading architecture in the same way does not turn buildings into novels but reveals their kinship: both are human attempts to make sense of time through space, to anchor events in material form. The invitation is not to seek closure but to think with narrative categories — to embrace the unbuilt chapters, the digressions, and the delays as part of architecture’s ongoing story.
No Comments